I don’t usually write blog posts based on a single passenger experience, but today is the day.
In the past 24 hours, a passenger on a Caribbean cruise made what seemed like a rational decision. With the winter storm looming, they chose to disembark early at a U.S. port and try to fly home ahead of deteriorating weather. Sensible on its face. Except they’re now facing several hundred dollars in fines—because of a protectionist maritime law passed in 1886.
Most cruisers have never heard of the Passenger Services Act of 1886. Yet it still governs how nearly every modern cruise operates, and when things go sideways, it can become painfully relevant very quickly.
The Passenger Services Act (PSA) restricts how passengers may be transported between U.S. ports. In plain language: foreign-flagged vessels—which includes almost every major cruise ship sailing today—cannot carry passengers between two U.S. ports unless the itinerary includes a qualifying foreign port.
This is why:
• Alaska cruises from Seattle stop in Canada
• Caribbean cruises round-trip from Florida include foreign islands
• Hawaii cruises from the mainland detour to Canada or Mexico
These stops aren’t optional flair. They’re legal requirements.
As long as you complete the cruise as ticketed, you’ll never notice the PSA. But the moment you leave the ship early at a U.S. port—voluntarily or not—you can trigger a violation.
That’s what happened this week.
The ship had not yet satisfied its foreign-port requirement. By disembarking early in the U.S., the passenger was technically transported between U.S. ports on a foreign vessel in violation of the law. The cruise line didn’t get fined. The passenger did.
This is where the PSA feels especially unforgiving.
Intent doesn’t matter. Weather doesn’t matter. Common sense doesn’t matter. The law doesn’t ask why you disembarked early—only where and when.
The consequences can include:
• Civil fines (often a few hundred dollars per person)
• Loss of cruise-arranged onward transportation
• Immediate responsibility for flights, hotels, and logistics
• Potential complications with insurance claims
And yes—this can happen even if you believe you’re being proactive or prudent.
I’m often asked whether medical disembarkations are exempt. The honest answer: sometimes, but not automatically.
In genuine emergencies, cruise lines and U.S. authorities may exercise discretion. But there is no blanket waiver in the law. Fines can still be assessed, and cruise lines are clear that penalties and costs fall to the passenger.
This is one of the reasons I am direct—sometimes uncomfortably so—about travel insurance and contingency planning for cruises involving U.S. ports.
Every year, travelers ask whether they can:
• Leave a cruise early because a port is convenient
• Fly home ahead of weather
• Skip the last sea day to get back sooner
From a traveler’s perspective, these feel like personal decisions. From a legal perspective, they are not.
Cruise lines are required to report passenger movements. Once you disembark, the process is automatic.
The Passenger Services Act of 1886 is obscure, outdated, and—depending on your view—overdue for reform. But it is still enforced.
For American cruisers, the practical guidance is straightforward:
• Do not plan to disembark early at a U.S. port
• Understand that “reasonable decisions” can still carry penalties
• Carry robust travel insurance that includes interruption coverage
• Talk through edge cases before you sail, not after
This week’s passenger didn’t do anything reckless. They did something logical. Unfortunately, logic and maritime law parted ways about 140 years ago.
This is exactly the kind of detail I flag for clients before they book—not to scare anyone, but to avoid unpleasant surprises when flexibility suddenly disappears.